4.5 Endocrine disruptors

Then he was a she…

(Lou Reed, American rock singer)

In 1996, a book called Our Stolen Future was published, bringing to public attention a debate that had been simmering among biologists for some time. Written by Theo Colborn and two colleagues at the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), this book presented the hypothesis that certain industrial chemicals, commonly found as environmental pollutants, are threatening human health by disrupting the body's hormonal system. These chemicals, variously called endocrine disruptors (end-oh-krin), hormone mimics or, in the media, ‘gender benders’, could be playing a role in a range of problems, from reproductive and developmental abnormalities, to defects of the nervous system, to cancer. This disturbing hypothesis was based on studies of both wild and laboratory animals, for which there was a steady accumulation of evidence that certain xenobiotic chemicals were disrupting normal development and reproduction. One of the most common examples of endocrine disruption involves, to varying extents, the feminisation of males. There seem to be no endocrine disruptors that masculinise females, but several disrupt the normal functioning of the female reproductive system (US Environmental Protection Agency, 1997).

While it is now widely accepted that endocrine disruptors are having serious effects on a variety of wild animals, there is considerable debate among biologists as to whether human health and reproduction are being affected. If they are, it represents a possible cost of living in the modern ‘human zoo’.

Endocrine disruptors get their name because they interact with the endocrine (hormonal) system in the body. The endocrine system consists primarily of a number of endocrine glands (also known as ductless glands) that each secrete one or more hormones directly into the bloodstream. A hormone is a substance produced by an endocrine gland that is carried by the bloodstream to other organs or tissues where it acts to alter their structure or function.

An important effect of some hormones is to regulate behaviour. This is true of the ‘flight or fight’ hormone epinephrine (formerly known as adrenalin) which, secreted by the suprarenal glands in response to danger and other alarming stimuli, activates the body and facilitates a rapid response. It is less true of sex hormones, such as oestrogen or testosterone, which have little immediate effect on behaviour, but which have a profound, long-term, organising effect on the body. Thus, the level of testosterone determines the timing of adolescence in boys, for example. This organising effect is important in the context of endocrine disruption because it means that, if an organism's endocrine system is disrupted early in life, it can have profound consequences that can affect it throughout its life.

Fundamental to understanding how hormones and endocrine disruptors work is the concept of a receptor. A receptor is a large, specialised molecular structure embedded in the membrane that forms the outer layer of a cell (Figure 13). It consists primarily of proteins that have affinity for a specific hormone, drug or other natural or synthetic chemical. For example, cells in the mammary glands of mammals have receptors on their surface with a special affinity for the hormone oestrogen, which is secreted primarily by the ovaries. When oestrogen comes into contact with an oestrogen receptor on a cell, it initiates a change within that cell. By this mechanism, oestrogen controls mammary development at adolescence and function during reproduction. Mammary glands are said to be ‘target organs’ of oestrogen. This ‘special affinity’ involves a process called binding, in which a specific part of a hormone molecule becomes attached to part of the corresponding receptor on the surface of the target cell, triggering a change within the target cell. Because of the specificity of this relationship, the process of binding is often likened to a key being inserted into a lock (Figure 13).

Figure 13: The ‘lock and key’ interaction between a signalling molecule (e.g. a hormone) and its specific receptor

Endocrine disruptors work because, although they are not hormones and often bear no obvious similarity to hormones, they happen to have in their molecular structure features that mimic the ‘key’ section of specific hormone molecules. Thus a substance that is not a hormone has the ability to ‘unlock the lock’ on target organs and thus behave as if the relevant hormone had become bound to them.

Before going on to examine endocrine disruptors in more detail, it is important to mention a related issue, the presence in the environment of real hormones. Women taking the contraceptive pill excrete substantial amounts of modified versions of human reproductive hormones, such as oestrogen, in their urine. Artificial hormones are not broken down in sewage treatment plants and so appear, sometimes in quite high concentrations, in sewage outflows into rivers. At a number of sites in the UK, male fish have been found to be feminised close to sewage outflows (Tyler et al., 1998).

It is important to emphasise that animals are very sensitive to very small variations in reproductive hormones. This is illustrated by work carried out by an American biologist, Fred vom Saal, who works on rodents (vom Saal and Bronson, 1978, vom Saal et al., 1999). Rodents have large litters and, during their development within their mother, embryos are lined up in the uterus in a row. In this row a male embryo may find itself between another two males, between two females, or between one of each. Vom Saal developed techniques to determine the exact position of each embryo prior to birth and to detect small variations in the behaviour of the young rodents that those embryos became as they grew up. He found that the behaviour of individuals was affected by their position in the uterus, as measured by variations in aggressive and sexual behaviour. Male rodents that had been between another two males in the uterus are more aggressive and sexually active than those that had been between two females. This effect is due to the fact that, even as embryos, young mammals secrete tiny quantities of sex hormones. This example gives credence to the hypothesis that very small amounts of hormone, or of hormone mimics, can influence animals as they develop.

The evidence for endocrine disruption in wildlife

During the 1970s and 1980s, biologists found alligators in Florida with reduced penis size and low fertility. About the same time Western gulls in the USA were found with abnormal mating behaviour and reproductive organs. These anomalies were linked to high levels of PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls), DDT and dioxin in the local environment. Around the same time, reproductive abnormalities were found in fish living in British rivers close to sewage outfalls. Such findings stimulated ecotoxicologists to start looking closely at a range of xenobiotic chemicals and their possible endocrine-disrupting effects.

For example, atrazine is the most widely used herbicide in the world; 30 000 tons of it are sprayed onto farmland in the USA each year. It can be detected at quite high levels in streams and rivers that collect run-off from farmland and has been detected at high levels in rain. In a laboratory study, tadpoles of the African clawed frog (Xenopus laevis) were reared in water containing atrazine at concentrations similar to those found in natural water bodies in the USA. The tadpoles grew, developed and metamorphosed into frogs, at which point they were examined in detail. Many of them were hermaphrodites, meaning that their gonads (testes and ovaries) contained both egg- and sperm-producing tissues. Many of those that were unequivocally male had a poorly developed larynx, the means by which males produce mating calls. Males that were allowed to develop to adult age showed a ten-fold decrease in testosterone level compared with untreated males (Hayes et al., 2002a, b).

The evidence for endocrine disruption in humans

Establishing a link between endocrine disruptors and human health is complicated by the fact that experiments of the kind conducted on animals are out of the question. It would be wholly unethical to administer DDT to people, for example, to see what effects it had on them. Studies on humans are thus limited to establishing a correlation between the presence of a xenobiotic chemical in the environment and some kind of health problem.

For example, the Aamjiwnaang are a community of Native Americans who live next to a major chemical complex in Ontario, Canada. Over the years, the ratio of boys and girls born in this community has been changing, from equal numbers in the period 1984–88 to 46 boys and 86 girls in 1999–2003. High levels of phthalates and hexachlorobenzene, both known to have endocrine-disrupting properties, have been found in the local soil (Mackenzie et al., 2005). Such data are suggestive of a causal link between endocrine-disrupting chemicals and a changed sex ratio, but do not provide conclusive proof for such a link. There may be other reasons why the sex ratio has changed.

By 2006, over 50 chemical compounds had been identified as endocrine disruptors. Many of these are long-lived compounds that can persist in the environment for many years without being degraded, and which can bioaccumulate in body tissues. They include several herbicides (e.g. atrazine), fungicides and insecticides (e.g. DDT); industrial chemicals and by-products such as PCBs and dioxin; and a number of compounds found in plastics, such as phthalates and styrenes, that are used to package foods and drinks (WRI, 1999). Levels of endocrine disruptors are especially high in heavily urbanised areas of the world.